Paraphrasing.....

Animals are being exteremly used in scientific researches nowadays. It is ambigious whether it should be done or not. While one side is saying that they, too, have right to live, the other side supports the idea that if animals are not used, what will be used instead of them.

Animals have right to live of course. They are animate, too. Using them in researches means taking their right of living from them. Generally, the researches result in the death of the animal and it is not matter if the animal died or not died. The topic of research is significant for the scientists. During the research the animals may probably have pain. In this issue, Bernard Rollin , a philosopher, said that no human benefit can lie on the animals pain.

On the other hand, some people say that animals should be used in scientific researches because if they are not used, we can not progress in the field of science on people. Especially, drug production, scientists have to test the items. How can they test? The drugs are for people and trying the new drug on people mean killing them. So scientists use animals as they resemble to the human kind a lot.

This matter is really worth argueing. Some are fan of using the animals in researches, some are not. But we should think carefully that the animals have right to live like us.





BERNARD ROLLIN: '' Any benefits to human beings cannot outweigh animal suffering''